According to his work on Autognorics, Lawsin discovered that for an organism or machine to be AWARE, it needs two things: (1) It is alive, and; (2) It is equipped with intuitive objects.
A machine is alive when it self-consumes energy. It is aware when it is driven or fitted with IOs. Intuitive Objects (IOs), a.k.a. Exyzforms, are natural objects that receive input and transmit output signals. Examples of intuitive objects are the eyes, nose, ears, skin, tongue, and brain. Other exyzforms in the human body that are unfamiliar to most of us are the biological sensors that detect body temperature or the sensor that balances our gait while walking. All these sensors may look different but in reality, they are all one and the same. Technically, they can be classified as Actuators and Collectors devices. However, actuators and collectors are structurally and functionally the same and work much like a radio transmitter and receiver or the classical string telephone system. The SKIN is the largest intuitive sensor that evolved and eventually created all other biological sensors.
Biological sensors are classified as exyzforms or intuitive objects because they evolve naturally with an embedded set of instructions through a process Lawsin called Inscription. This inscripted algorithm makes exyzforms structurally intuitive through its design much like a circle in any shapes that always create a pi. Exyzforms also receive and transmit the same type of signals. These signals that come and go on the same exact wise sensors are nothing but waves that move up and down in rhythmic binary behaviors.
Awareness does not emanate from the brain. This is a misconception. Awareness is a system and by-product of IOs. Without sensors, awareness will not exist. As enumerated in the previous article, there are many living organisms that do not have brains but are aware due to the fact that these creatures have sensors and not because they have brains.
In the video, the machine is made up of sensors. It can navigate itself because it is supplied with sensors that do certain tasks. Its walking cadence is embedded by its design, a natural instruction uncovered by Lawsin in his Biotronics experiments. He called this phenomenon as Inscripted by Design or ID.
The state of being the machine exhibits is known as Sensoric Awareness. This is the second characteristic of Life according to the study on Originemology.
Machines are not self-aware similar to newborns at the ages of 1 to 6 months. But to I.M., when information is introduced to these life forms, they become alive, aware, conscious, rational, and self-knowledge. When they are raised side by side with exactly the same controlled environment as in our homes, they become two similar beings as well; emotionally, mentally, physically, and socially the same although they might be totally two different species.
To prove this last statement, let us first imagine that in a confined dwelling, there are two newborn beings: a puppy and a baby being simultaneously nurtured, raised, and taken care of by the same members of the family. The machine will be compared next, once we established how pieces of information are acquired from external sources.
Inside this house, the baby will gain various pieces of information through her biological sensors. She will pick up cues unknowingly since she has no previous knowledge of these cues. She might have a brain, but her brain is not matured enough to store information. She might jerk when she hears a loud noise. This behavior is due to the signals detected by her biological sensors and not because she knows what noise is. She cuddles when she feels her sister's soft touch. She jiggles when she tastes her mother's flat milk. She reacts with the temperature inside the room, the sounds from the television, the aromas from the kitchen, and the noises from the outside world. All of these reactions are due to the fact that she is equipped with sensors.
If in the same exact house, the puppy is also raised by the same people. Most likely, he will be interacting with the same dad, mom, and kids as well. He will also hear, smell, see, feel everything in the house. He will react with the temperature inside and outside the house, the sounds from the radio or television, the smells from the kitchen, the taste of the food, and the synergies of the family.
When both baby and puppy are placed in the same bed next to the owners, both species will also experience the same comfort, protection, love, and affection. What the baby sees, smells, feels, hears is what the puppy sees, smells, feels, and hears as well. When they are placed separately in the garage overnight, both will also experience the same coldness, loneliness, anxieties, and nastiness of the place. Whatever the situation is, both beings will identically undergo the same exact experiences. It is not because one is a puppy or a baby, but it is all because they were brought up in the same exact environment with the same exact information. (This claim answers Nagel's "What it is like to be a bat.")
From these illustrations, we can conclude that when two species live in the same environment, both will definitely acquire the same exact information. Just like in our examples, the information obtained by the baby will exactly be the same information gained by the puppy because they are identically surrounded by the same objects and people in the house. The information they gained from the house, where all information began, programmed them to be the same beings and eventually molded the baby's totality of becoming a being, a human being, a conscious human being. And from the same exact house, the dog too becomes a being, not an animal, but a human being as well.
The cross-connections of the sensors of awareness and the senses of awareness, e.g. taste-flat, touch-soft, smell-scent, hear-noise, by an individual essentially leads to the exploratory informational phenomenon known as consciousness. The twoness of Sensor-Senses is the dualpairing that defines the meaning of awareness and consciousness. Sensors and senses (S/S) establish awareness. When crossmatch (S2S), they establish consciousness.
Meanwhile, some might argue that the baby in the example is totally different from the puppy because the brain of the child is more complex than the brain of the dog. Again, this is another misconception. Why? The brain's complexity might be true but content-wise, they are the same. In their early stage, they come with the same minimal "empty" brains. The brain is empty with information from birth. According to the Caveman in the box theory, Information must be acquired, compared, codified, and transmitted first before it becomes communal knowledge. The brain, which is believed by some to be the seat of consciousness, follows this process of acquisition, association, codexation, and transmission to be fully functional.
And on a conscious note, a puppy who is nurtured in a house is " a human being in an animal suit". A puppy who is nurtured in the wild is " a wild animal in an animal suit". And if ever you humanize a dog, make sure you know what you are doing, or else, you might end up raising a "child" in a cage. Just be careful!
Never ever humanize a dog, you might raise a kid in a cage. ~ joey Lawsin
Comments
Please log in or sign up to comment.